Tinubu Barred From Aso Rock


Former Lagos State governor, Senator Ahmed Bola Tinubu, may have incurred the wrath of President Umaru Yar’Adua over what was described as “acts unbecoming of a former governor.”


Indeed, the President may have ordered security agencies to thwart any attempt by the former governor to have access to Aso Rock, the seat of power.


Highly impeccable sources close to the presidency disclosed that the President declared Tinubu persona non grata to Aso Rock following what the sources disclosed as name-dropping of Yar’Adua by Tinubu.


According to the sources, Yar’Adua became angry when he got security reports that Tinubu was going about telling many people in the country and abroad that he was close to Yar’Adua and that he could enter the Aso Rock anytime he liked due to his closeness to the President.


He was quoted to have said that he used to see the president on a daily basis. But President Yar’Adua, the very credible sources said, got very angry when he got the report, saying that the last time he ever saw Tinubu was over 17 months ago.


The President was also reported to have said he never knew Tinubu before he became a governor, contrary to what the former Lagos State governor was telling people.


Yar’Adua reportedly said he only knew Tinubu through a very close aide.


The sources said President Yar’Adua had to call the top aide to inform him about the name-dropping attitude of Tinubu. He then asked him to warn Tinubu never to drop his name.


The visibly angry Yar’Adua also told his security aides that he should never see Tinubu at the Presidential Villa for whatever reasons and that the security chiefs should henceforth monitor his activities.


It was not long after this development that the issue of the controversy over the 57 local government areas resurfaced. It will be recalled that Tinubu had a running battle with former President Olusegun Obasanjo over the controversial 20 local governments and 37 development areas as the former president withheld the allocations to the local governments for many years.


The administration then insisted that Lagos must revert to the 20 local government areas before the allocations could be released, but the Tinubu’s administration insisted that Lagos must have more than 20 local governments.


After some time, his government reverted to 20 local government areas and created 37 council development areas, a move that did not go down well with the Federal Government.


But with the current attitude of Tinubu, sources said President Yar’Adua decided to revisit the issue of the 57 local government areas in the state which he said were illegal as the 1999 Constitution only recognised 20 councils.


He has, therefore, threatened to drag the current government of Babatude Fashola to court over the council issue. Fashola was the Chief of Staff when Tinubu was the governor of the state.

Terror Strike In The North: Bodies Litter Streets, Boko Haram Leader shot dead!


Borno State government on Friday collected hundreds of bodies from the streets of Maiduguri on Friday following days of clashes with members of the Islamic sect, Boko Haramu.


Government and health ministry officials piled the corpses, some of them swollen after lying in the streets for days, onto open trucks as police and soldiers patrolled, according to Reuters news agency.


"As of yesterday, we had more than 200 dead bodies," Aliyu Maikano, northeastern zone disaster management officer for the Nigerian Red Cross, told Reuters, adding that bodies were still being collected.


The toll in Maiduguri brings to at least 600 the total number of people killed in violence that erupted in several states in northern Nigeria since Sunday.


The authorities are hoping the killing of sect leader, Mohammed Yusuf, whose Boko Haramu movement wants a wider adoption of Sharia (Islamic law) across the country, will bring an end to the six-day uprising by his followers.


Yusuf, 39, was shot dead while in police detention late on Thursday. Officials have said he died in a shoot-out while trying to escape.


Hundreds of people gathered on Friday to see Yusuf's corpse, laid on the ground in front of Maiduguri police headquarters alongside the bodies of other presumed Boko Haramu, members.


"I want to see the body of Mohammed Yusuf to know the man who has caused us so much pain and hardship. May his soul rot in hell," said one Maiduguri resident, Nasir Abba, in whose neighbourhood some of the heaviest fighting took place.


A Reuters reporter earlier counted 23 bloodied bodies with what appeared to be fresh bullet wounds, among them a former commissioner for religious affairs in the state believed to be a Boko Haram supporter, Alhaji Buji Fai.


"Alhaji Buji Fai was killed along with other fleeing Boko Haramu in an exchange of fire this morning along Benishek-Maiduguri road," said Isa Azare, spokesman for the police command in Maiduguri.


The Red Cross said 182 people were being treated at two hospitals in Maiduguri for gunshot wounds, machete blows, knife wounds and beatings.


"These are civilians ... we have not identified any Muslim sect members among these injured," he said, adding that army doctors and nurses were helping civilian medics.


He said around 3,500 displaced people were still sheltering in barracks but, encouraged by the killing of Yusuf and other leading sect members, many had started to return home.

Fashola wrote angrily to Yaradua on Dissolution of LCDAs


The letter is reproduced below:

RE: THE ALTERATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNISED LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE IN LAGOS STATE BY THE STATE GoVERNMENT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND NATIONAL UNITY
Your letter of 14th July 2009 refers,
Mr. President, after declaring a public amnesty with regards to the Niger Delta crisis, which was intended to bring peace to the country and calm frayed nerves in order to set a platform for meaningful development, the receipt of your letter signed barely twenty four (24) hours after an unprovoked attack on Lagos on the 13th July 2009, in which officers and men of the Nigerian Military lost their lives came as a shock to me.

As Commander-in-Chief, your silence in spite of this attack, and the timing of this letter heightens my concerns and causes me very deep apprehension about the motives behind the advice on which Your Excellency has acted in this matter and the intent of the entire letter at a time when all levels of Government must be working towards promoting peace and stability.

In specific response to the issues raised in your letter under reference. it is perhaps proper to start with a reminder that the decision of the Lagos State Government to conduct elections on 11th October 2008 into 20 local Government Councils and 37 Local Council Development Areas was based on laws validly enacted by the Lagos State House of Assembly pursuant to its legislative competence under the Constitution. The laws under which the Local Council Development Areas were created and under which the elections were conducted are as follows:

(i) The Creation of local Government Areas law No.5 2002;
(ii) The Creation of New Local Government Areas (Amendment) Law No. 15 of 2004;
(iii) The Creation of New Local Government Areas (Amendment! (No.2) Law of 2005; and
(iv) The Lagos State Independent Electoral Commission Law 2008.
The decision of the Supreme Court noted in Your Excellency’s letter in the case of Attorney General of Lagos state v. Attorney General of the Federation (2005] 2 WRN 1 affirms the validity of two of the laws mentioned above namely, the Creation of local Government Areas law No. 5 2002 and the Creation of New local Government Areas

(Amendment) Law 2004.
In the judgment delivered by Uwais CJN, as he then was, the Supreme Court held that:
“having read all the provisions of the Constitution aforementioned I am satisfied that the House of Assembly of Lagos State has the right to pass the creation of Local Government Areas (Amendment) Law 2004” See AG Lagos v. AG Federation & Ors.
His Lordship further noted that:
“ ... the Laws are valid but inchoate until the necessary steps as provided by the Constitution are taken by the

National Assembly”
This position is also supported by the judgment of Iguh JSC when his Lordship held that:
‘“ Have therefore no difficulty in coming to the conclusion that the Lagos State Government’s Law No. 5 of 2002 is unquestionably constitutional and having complied with the provision of sections 7(J) and 8(3) of the Constitution.” see AG Lagos v. AG Federation & Ors.
Consequently there is no conflict between the Laws under which the new Local Council Development Areas were created and the
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
I therefore cannot agree with the advice that you have been given that the decision of the High Court in Chief Taiwo Joseph Tovi-Hungevu v. Abraham O. Ogabi Ors in anyway suggests that the Creation of Local

Government Areas law No. 5 2002 and the Creation of New local Government Areas (Amendment) law 2004 are null or void in effect.
It follows that the renamed Local Council Development Areas cannot be referred to as illegal administrative bodies having been validly created under Laws enacted by the Lagos State House of Assembly, which the Supreme Court has pronounced as validly made Laws.

Indeed the Supreme Court NEVER declared them illegal.
It is curious and worrying that Your Excellency has elected to act on advice suggesting that a lower court can pronounce as illegal what the Supreme Court has declared to be valid. This is a grave threat to the long established hierarchy of our Courts and our judicial system, and is not the rule of Law.
As the head of a State Government that is committed to the highest standards of Constitutionalism and legality, I regret that I am unable to accede to your request to alter the current status quo by stopping the operation of the 37 Local Council Development Areas.

It would require me as head of the Executive arm of the State Government to alter the provisions of an existing and valid law made by the Lagos State House of Assembly.
Your Excellency, I must reiterate that the Lagos State Government. Pursuant to Section 8 of the Constitution had forwarded returns of the necessary processes relating to the creation of the new Local Government Councils to the National Assembly to enable it make consequential amendments to the first schedule of the Constitution.

While we await the National Assembly’s discharge of its responsibility, the doctrine of separation of powers requires that each arm of government should be allowed to operate without interference from any other arm of government.
It will be pre-emptive for the Executive arm of Government to take any position that would prejudice the exercise of the power of the Legislature to discharge its responsibility, when there is no competent challenge to the validity of the Laws passed by the Lagos State House of Assembly that can in any way affect the administrative entities created there under.

Respectfully and contrary to Your Excellency’s assertions, I must caution that any steps taken outside the due process of the law by the Nations’ Executive against a sub - national government such as Lagos State in this matter will pose a grave threat to constitutionalism, our democracy and good governance, because it will amount to a usurpation of constitutionally guaranteed State autonomy and a violation of the Constitution.

“the Federal Government felt aggrieved by Lagos State creating more loco’ governments, the best solution is to seek redress in a court of law, without resorting to self _ help. In a society where the rule of law prevails. self help is not available to the executive or any arm of government”
An unavoidable fact is that the legal advice you have received seems to be rooted in disparate (I believe patently wrong) interpretation of the decision of the Supreme Court referred to above. While the actions of the Lagos State Government have been dictated by our belief that the decision supports the actions that we have taken, the Federal Government apparently has a contrary view.

As Your Excellency is aware, the interpretation of Laws is the constitutional preserve of the Judiciary. Where parties are in genuine controversy as to the legality of an action, the rightful course is to approach the Judiciary to seek authoritative pronouncement on the legality of disputed actions.
Permit me to draw your attention to the advice of the Supreme Court in Attorney General of. Lagos State v. Attorney General of the Federation as follows:

I respectfully urge your Excellency to reappraise the advice given on this matter.
In a constitutional democracy the Federal Government does not enjoy the prerogative of compelling a state entity to conform with its will _ however well conceived - except where that will conforms with the law.
The Federal and State Governments are autonomous entities within the sphere of authority and competence vested in each Government under the Constitution. In Attorney General of Lagos State v. Attorney

“But I do not need to repeat that Nigeria operates a federal system of government. Section 2(2) of the 1999 Constitution reenacts the doctrine of federalism. This ensures the autonomy of each government. None of the governments is subordinate to each other. This is particularly of relevance between the State Governments and the Federal Government, each being, as said by Nwabueze in his book, The Presidential Constitution of Nigeria, page 39-42, an autonomous entity in the sense of being able to exercise its own will in the conduct of its affairs within the Constitution, free from direction by another government”.

Should your Excellency take further and alternative legal advice as respectfully urge that you now do; you will find that where any party. Particularly the Federal Government is of the opinion that the Lagos State Government has acted contrary to the decision of the Supreme Court. It should follow the procedure for the enforcement of that judgment as stipulated by the rules of court and certainly not to employing the use of Federal “... organs of state to ... preserve the authority of the Federal Government” as stated in your letter. This is the practice that will be consistent with the Rule of Low.
Finally, Your Excellency, at this time when our economy is challenged and our people are expectant and looking up to us for leadership and direction, our Country can do without a political or constitutional crises over a matter, which constitutionally and demonstrably constitutes no threat to our Nation.
To persist, as Your Excellency threatens in your letter will suggest that this is a deliberate political crisis and not one of necessity.

However let me continue to assure you of my unwavering commitment to constitutionalism and the due process of the Law; you will find that my office and the Government of La.gos state will remain Willing partners in development and amicable resolution of disputes when called upon.
Your Excellency, please accept my best wishes and sincere compliments.
Babatunde Raji Fashola, SAN Governor of Lagos State

Nigeria’s Judicial Commission Rejects List of Appellate Court Nominees

In a move that is being hailed in some quarters but also viewed with suspicion in others, the National Judicial Commission (NJC) today rejected the list of all judges packaged for elevation to the Court of Appeal by the court’s controversial outgoing president, Justice Umaru Abdullahi.

In several reports following Justice Abdullahi’s compilation of the list, investigators had revealed a plan by the Umaru Yar’adua regime to flood the appellate court with justices with notorious reputations for corruption. Our investigation revealed that Yar’adua and the ruling party sought to entrench these rogue justices in anticipation of the party’s plan to, once again, steal votes in the next round of general elections in 2011.

The Court of Appeal is the final arbiter in most electoral petitions but is first to weigh petitions arising from the presidential election.

The earlier plot to install a decadent appellate court was designed by Abdullahi, the outgoing Katsina-born president of the court of appeal who is retiring in a matter of weeks, having attained the compulsory age of retirement, Michael Aondoakaa, Nigeria’s most corrupt attorney general, and James Ibori, the former governor of Delta State – a practiced hand at compromising the judiciary.

Our earlier reports indicated that several of Justice Abdullahi’s nominees for the appellate court were linked to fraudulent election petition litigations. The nominees included the son of Supreme Court Justice Nikki Tobi, who was tapped for promotion by the Yar’adua regime to compensate his father for the despicable role he played in a shocking verdict that validated Yar’adua’s “victory” in the widely condemned 2007 presidential elections.

In today’s meeting, NJC members kicked against the lack of transparency involved in the selection of the judges for promotion to the Court of Appeal. A source within the commission told Saharareporters that several members were particularly miffed by the inclusion of Nikki Tobi’s son, Ebowei Tobi, a little known state judge in the Delta State judiciary.

The source also revealed that, following our earlier reports, members of the NJC raised questions about the failure to reflect federal character in the nominations. “The list of nominees simply did not fairly represent appointment of judges across the six zones of the Nigerian federation,” said the source.

However, another member of the commission as well as two sources at the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) told our correspondents that today’s action by the NJC was actually a tactical maneuver by Yar’adua and his allied interests, including former Governor James Ibori of Delta and Justice Nikki Tobi.

“I can assure you that these interests were behind the cancellation of the entire list,” said the NJC source. He said Yar’adua, Ibori and Tobi were alarmed when Justice Legbo Kutigi, the nation’s current chief justice, and the Federal Judicial Service Commission removed the names of some of the worst nominees in the first round of screening.

“As soon as Yar’adua and his group saw that the most fraudulent judges, earlier exposed in your reports, had been dropped at the first level of screening, they decided to sabotage the surviving nominees in order to give themselves another opportunity to regroup.

Among the cash-for-hire judges weeded out by the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) are Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia, a federal high court judge known for wheeling and dealing; Justice Aisha Sani Dahiru, the Chief Judge of Sokoto State; Mrs. Binta Nyako (wife of the Adamawa State governor); Justice Muhtar Dodo; Justice Amina Wanbai; and Ibrahim Nyaure Buba (a judge whose notoriety includes giving former Governor Peter Odili of Rivers State a perpetual injunction shielding him from prosecution for money laundering).

This had also reported that Justice Akinjide Ajakaiye, Justice Samuel Attah (who nullified Governor Sullivan Chime’s election), Justice Idris Ebuti from Niger State and Justice Rita Pemu from Edo State dropped by the FJSC.

A source disclosed that, following the exposé on the shady activities of many of the judges, the petitions against them that the FJSC had hitherto ignored began to receive expeditious attention. This scrutiny culminated in the commission’s weeding-out of the most embarrassingly corrupt and inept judges.

A source in the NBA also disclosed that Yar’adua and Ibori did not take the reversals lightly. The source added that NBA members got signals at last week’s meeting of the association in Port Harcourt that the Yar’adua/Ibori camp wanted to put up a new fight.

She said the clearest sign came from Ibori’s lawyer, J.B. Daudu, who strongly lobbied the NBA to reject what remained of the list of nominees. Mr. Daudu, who is one of the NBA representatives in the NJC, had based his case for wholesale rejection on the grounds that the South East was not represented on the list.

On the basis of that report, the NBA agreed to send a letter protesting the list.

“It’s bizarre that Justice Abdullahi would forward a list of judges and not include any nominees from the South East,” said another NBA source. Yet, he contended that the same entrenched political interests that had drawn up the list in the first place – seeking to shape a weak appellate court filled with sympathetic and corrupt justices – was also behind the push to junk the list. “That smells fishy to me,” said the lawyer, a former officer in the bar association.

In throwing the list, the NJC urged that state chief judges ought to be involved in nominating persons of impressive legal pedigree for elevation to the Court of Appeal – due to resume from vacation in September.

While one source who opposed Abdullahi’s initial list greeted the rejection of the entire list as a victory, two sources (one a lawyer, the other a member of the NJC) called for renewed vigilance and caution.

“Given the resolve of the players who want to use the judiciary to attain their illegitimate goals, I won’t be surprised to see the names of some of the most pliable and corrupt judges crop up again in a new list in future,” said a lawyer. He said the incoming president of the Court of Appeal could be susceptible to financial inducement from Yar’adua – and succumb to pressure to present again judges who are “rotten apples.” He said, “There’s no question that Yar’adua plans to rig himself into the office of president in 2011,” adding that “a lot depends on the personal integrity and professional ethics of the next appellate court president.”

Justice Abdullahi would be remembered for presiding over the most corrupt and incompetent arm of the Nigerian judiciary, the Court of Appeal of Nigeria.

Why Reps Want To Impeach Yar’Adua

Since the House of Representatives signalled its resolve to initiate a process towards impeaching President Umaru Yar’Adua over poor implementation of the 2009 budget, indications are rife that the desire to make the House do so has started welling up in more members.


The representatives had, during the week, taken on the president on his attitude to budget implementation, accusing his government of breaching the constitution by failing to fully implement the 2009 budget as passed by the National Assembly.


Checks among members by the report revealed that the angry representatives were indeed, waiting for debate on reports commissioned by the House on performance level of the 2009 to demonstrate their seriousness on the threat of impeachment against the president.


Members, who spoke on the issue said that the issue of constituency projects was not the only reason the federal legislators had not been happy with the government of Yar’Adua, stressing that the House had rather been upbeat on the signs of degeneration of governance which, they said, had been ominous for democracy.


They said when the reports on budget performance come up for debate, the House would be emphatic in letting the nation know that the presidency must sit tight more than ever in tackling the growing problems of corruption, poor standard of living in Nigeria, increasing rate of unemployment and general poverty in the country.


Members also alluded to the general disenchantment in Nigeria with the present government as reflected by the strike actions being embarked upon by different labour unions and the general insecurity in the country.


Before the House issued the threat to impeach Yar’Adua during the week, it had earlier issued such threat twice this year, although subtly, while expressing alleged displeasure on the selective approach to budget implementation by the president.


More members are complaining that the problem of budget implementation had been responsible for low level of circulation of money in the country, whereas, only a clique withing the government is being percieved as amassing stupendous wealth at the expense of the larger society.


Indication that members of the House would not take the threat of impeachment against President Yar’Adua lightly had emerged last Thursday when members resisted an attempt to lure them to the dining table by the Presidency in its possible move towards pacifying the angry legislators.


The special adviser on National Assembly Matters to President Yar’Adua, Senator Muhammed Abba Aji, had forwarded a letter to the House inviting members across political parties to a “consultative meeting and lunch with the leadership and members of the House on budget.”


The House resolved to shun the meeting with the presidency on budget when a member, Honourable Halims Agoda, raised a point of order to advise his colleagues to that effect as he alleged a plot by the Presidency to lure members and trap them on their plot.


Presenting his argument, Agoda said “I am, therefore, urging the House of Representatives to discard that letter and tell the president to go and implement the (2009) budget as passed.”


Honourable Igo Aguma spoke in a similar manner stating, “this House has passed a number of resolutions on the non-implementation of budgets by the Presidency, and we cannot partake in that kind of the breach of the rights of ordinary Nigerians to enjoy the fruits of the budget, by going to dine with them.


He added, “There is no water, there is no security, and there is no light. No food, no hospitals, and health workers are on strike, ASUU is on strike for the non-payment of their arrears and salaries, but the president is, instead, calling on us to go and wine and dine with him. This House should reject that and call on the president to go and implement the budget as passed,” he said.


Although, the threat by the House to impeach the President had unsettled the leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) said to be making moves to contain the threat before it hit the airwaves, the House had also indicated that it would not be cowed by any influence from the ruling party.

Text of Obama's speech in Ghana

Good morning. It is an honor for me to be in Accra, and to speak to the representatives of the people of Ghana. I am deeply grateful for the welcome that I've received, as are Michelle, Malia and Sasha Obama. Ghana's history is rich, the ties between our two countries are strong, and I am proud that this is my first visit to sub-Saharan Africa as President of the United States.

I am speaking to you at the end of a long trip. I began in Russia, for a Summit between two great powers. I traveled to Italy, for a meeting of the world's leading economies. And I have come here, to Ghana, for a simple reason: the 21st century will be shaped by what happens not just in Rome or Moscow or Washington, but by what happens in Accra as well.

This is the simple truth of a time when the boundaries between people are overwhelmed by our connections. Your prosperity can expand America's. Your health and security can contribute to the world's. And the strength of your democracy can help advance human rights for people everywhere.

So I do not see the countries and peoples of Africa as a world apart; I see Africa as a fundamental part of our interconnected world — as partners with America on behalf of the future that we want for all our children. That partnership must be grounded in mutual responsibility, and that is what I want to speak with you about today.

We must start from the simple premise that Africa's future is up to Africans.

I say this knowing full well the tragic past that has sometimes haunted this part of the world. I have the blood of Africa within me, and my family's own story encompasses both the tragedies and triumphs of the larger African story.

My grandfather was a cook for the British in Kenya, and though he was a respected elder in his village, his employers called him "boy" for much of his life. He was on the periphery of Kenya's liberation struggles, but he was still imprisoned briefly during repressive times. In his life, colonialism wasn't simply the creation of unnatural borders or unfair terms of trade — it was something experienced personally, day after day, year after year.

My father grew up herding goats in a tiny village, an impossible distance away from the American universities where he would come to get an education. He came of age at an extraordinary moment of promise for Africa. The struggles of his own father's generation were giving birth to new nations, beginning right here in Ghana. Africans were educating and asserting themselves in new ways. History was on the move.

But despite the progress that has been made — and there has been considerable progress in parts of Africa — we also know that much of that promise has yet to be fulfilled. Countries like Kenya, which had a per capita economy larger than South Korea's when I was born, have been badly outpaced. Disease and conflict have ravaged parts of the African continent. In many places, the hope of my father's generation gave way to cynicism, even despair.

It is easy to point fingers, and to pin the blame for these problems on others. Yes, a colonial map that made little sense bred conflict, and the West has often approached Africa as a patron, rather than a partner. But the West is not responsible for the destruction of the Zimbabwean economy over the last decade, or wars in which children are enlisted as combatants. In my father's life, it was partly tribalism and patronage in an independent Kenya that for a long stretch derailed his career, and we know that this kind of corruption is a daily fact of life for far too many.

Of course, we also know that is not the whole story. Here in Ghana, you show us a face of Africa that is too often overlooked by a world that sees only tragedy or the need for charity. The people of Ghana have worked hard to put democracy on a firmer footing, with peaceful transfers of power even in the wake of closely contested elections. And with improved governance and an emerging civil society, Ghana's economy has shown impressive rates of growth.

This progress may lack the drama of the 20th century's liberation struggles, but make no mistake: it will ultimately be more significant. For just as it is important to emerge from the control of another nation, it is even more important to build one's own.

So I believe that this moment is just as promising for Ghana — and for Africa — as the moment when my father came of age and new nations were being born. This is a new moment of promise. Only this time, we have learned that it will not be giants like Nkrumah and Kenyatta who will determine Africa's future. Instead, it will be you — the men and women in Ghana's Parliament, and the people you represent. Above all, it will be the young people — brimming with talent and energy and hope — who can claim the future that so many in my father's generation never found.

To realize that promise, we must first recognize a fundamental truth that you have given life to in Ghana: development depends upon good governance. That is the ingredient which has been missing in far too many places, for far too long. That is the change that can unlock Africa's potential. And that is a responsibility that can only be met by Africans.

As for America and the West, our commitment must be measured by more than just the dollars we spend. I have pledged substantial increases in our foreign assistance, which is in Africa's interest and America's. But the true sign of success is not whether we are a source of aid that helps people scrape by — it is whether we are partners in building the capacity for transformational change.

This mutual responsibility must be the foundation of our partnership. And today, I will focus on four areas that are critical to the future of Africa and the entire developing world: democracy; opportunity; health; and the peaceful resolution of conflict.

First, we must support strong and sustainable democratic governments.

As I said in Cairo, each nation gives life to democracy in its own way, and in line with its own traditions. But history offers a clear verdict: governments that respect the will of their own people are more prosperous, more stable and more successful than governments that do not.

This is about more than holding elections — it's also about what happens between them. Repression takes many forms, and too many nations are plagued by problems that condemn their people to poverty. No country is going to create wealth if its leaders exploit the economy to enrich themselves, or police can be bought off by drug traffickers. No business wants to invest in a place where the government skims 20 percent off the top, or the head of the port authority is corrupt. No person wants to live in a society where the rule of law gives way to the rule of brutality and bribery. That is not democracy, that is tyranny, and now is the time for it to end.

In the 21st century, capable, reliable and transparent institutions are the key to success — strong parliaments and honest police forces; independent judges and journalists; a vibrant private sector and civil society. Those are the things that give life to democracy, because that is what matters in peoples' lives.

Time and again, Ghanaians have chosen Constitutional rule over autocracy, and shown a democratic spirit that allows the energy of your people to break through. We see that in leaders who accept defeat graciously, and victors who resist calls to wield power against the opposition. We see that spirit in courageous journalists like Anas Aremeyaw Anas, who risked his life to report the truth. We see it in police like Patience Quaye, who helped prosecute the first human trafficker in Ghana. We see it in the young people who are speaking up against patronage and participating in the political process.

Across Africa, we have seen countless examples of people taking control of their destiny and making change from the bottom up. We saw it in Kenya, where civil society and business came together to help stop postelection violence. We saw it in South Africa, where over three quarters of the country voted in the recent election — the fourth since the end of apartheid. We saw it in Zimbabwe, where the Election Support Network braved brutal repression to stand up for the principle that a person's vote is their sacred right.

Make no mistake: history is on the side of these brave Africans and not with those who use coups or change Constitutions to stay in power. Africa doesn't need strongmen, it needs strong institutions.

America will not seek to impose any system of government on any other nation — the essential truth of democracy is that each nation determines its own destiny. What we will do is increase assistance for responsible individuals and institutions, with a focus on supporting good governance — on parliaments, which check abuses of power and ensure that opposition voices are heard; on the rule of law, which ensures the equal administration of justice; on civic participation, so that young people get involved; and on concrete solutions to corruption like forensic accounting, automating services, strengthening hot lines and protecting whistle-blowers to advance transparency and accountability.

As we provide this support, I have directed my administration to give greater attention to corruption in our human rights report. People everywhere should have the right to start a business or get an education without paying a bribe. We have a responsibility to support those who act responsibly and to isolate those who don't, and that is exactly what America will do.

This leads directly to our second area of partnership — supporting development that provides opportunity for more people.

With better governance, I have no doubt that Africa holds the promise of a broader base for prosperity. The continent is rich in natural resources. And from cell phone entrepreneurs to small farmers, Africans have shown the capacity and commitment to create their own opportunities. But old habits must also be broken. Dependence on commodities — or on a single export — concentrates wealth in the hands of the few and leaves people too vulnerable to downturns.

In Ghana, for instance, oil brings great opportunities, and you have been responsible in preparing for new revenue. But as so many Ghanaians know, oil cannot simply become the new cocoa. From South Korea to Singapore, history shows that countries thrive when they invest in their people and infrastructure; when they promote multiple export industries, develop a skilled work force and create space for small and medium-sized businesses that create jobs.

As Africans reach for this promise, America will be more responsible in extending our hand. By cutting costs that go to Western consultants and administration, we will put more resources in the hands of those who need it, while training people to do more for themselves. That is why our $3.5 billion food security initiative is focused on new methods and technologies for farmers — not simply sending American producers or goods to Africa. Aid is not an end in itself. The purpose of foreign assistance must be creating the conditions where it is no longer needed.

America can also do more to promote trade and investment. Wealthy nations must open our doors to goods and services from Africa in a meaningful way. And where there is good governance, we can broaden prosperity through public-private partnerships that invest in better roads and electricity; capacity-building that trains people to grow a business; and financial services that reach poor and rural areas. This is also in our own interest — for if people are lifted out of poverty and wealth is created in Africa, new markets will open for our own goods.

One area that holds out both undeniable peril and extraordinary promise is energy. Africa gives off less greenhouse gas than any other part of the world, but it is the most threatened by climate change. A warming planet will spread disease, shrink water resources and deplete crops, creating conditions that produce more famine and conflict. All of us — particularly the developed world — have a responsibility to slow these trends — through mitigation, and by changing the way that we use energy. But we can also work with Africans to turn this crisis into opportunity.

Together, we can partner on behalf of our planet and prosperity and help countries increase access to power while skipping the dirtier phase of development. Across Africa, there is bountiful wind and solar power; geothermal energy and bio-fuels. From the Rift Valley to the North African deserts; from the Western coast to South Africa's crops — Africa's boundless natural gifts can generate its own power, while exporting profitable, clean energy abroad.

These steps are about more than growth numbers on a balance sheet. They're about whether a young person with an education can get a job that supports a family; a farmer can transfer their goods to the market; or an entrepreneur with a good idea can start a business. It's about the dignity of work. Its about the opportunity that must exist for Africans in the 21st century.

Just as governance is vital to opportunity, it is also critical to the third area that I will talk about — strengthening public health.

In recent years, enormous progress has been made in parts of Africa. Far more people are living productively with HIV/AIDS, and getting the drugs they need. But too many still die from diseases that shouldn't kill them. When children are being killed because of a mosquito bite, and mothers are dying in childbirth, then we know that more progress must be made.

Yet because of incentives — often provided by donor nations — many African doctors and nurses understandably go overseas, or work for programs that focus on a single disease. This creates gaps in primary care and basic prevention. Meanwhile, individual Africans also have to make responsible choices that prevent the spread of disease, while promoting public health in their communities and countries.

Across Africa, we see examples of people tackling these problems. In Nigeria, an interfaith effort of Christians and Muslims has set an example of cooperation to confront malaria. Here in Ghana and across Africa, we see innovative ideas for filling gaps in care — for instance, through E-Health initiatives that allow doctors in big cities to support those in small towns.

America will support these efforts through a comprehensive, global health strategy. Because in the 21st century, we are called to act by our conscience and our common interest. When a child dies of a preventable illness in Accra, that diminishes us everywhere. And when disease goes unchecked in any corner of the world, we know that it can spread across oceans and continents.

That is why my administration has committed $63 billion to meet these challenges. Building on the strong efforts of President Bush, we will carry forward the fight against HIV/AIDS. We will pursue the goal of ending deaths from malaria and tuberculosis, and eradicating polio. We will fight neglected tropical disease. And we won't confront illnesses in isolation — we will invest in public health systems that promote wellness and focus on the health of mothers and children.

As we partner on behalf of a healthier future, we must also stop the destruction that comes not from illness, but from human beings — and so the final area that I will address is conflict.

Now let me be clear: Africa is not the crude caricature of a continent at war. But for far too many Africans, conflict is a part of life, as constant as the sun. There are wars over land and wars over resources. And it is still far too easy for those without conscience to manipulate whole communities into fighting among faiths and tribes.

These conflicts are a millstone around Africa's neck. We all have many identities — of tribe and ethnicity; of religion and nationality. But defining oneself in opposition to someone who belongs to a different tribe, or who worships a different prophet, has no place in the 21st century. Africa's diversity should be a source of strength, not a cause for division. We are all God's children. We all share common aspirations — to live in peace and security; to access education and opportunity; to love our families, our communities, and our faith. That is our common humanity.

That is why we must stand up to inhumanity in our midst. It is never justifiable to target innocents in the name of ideology. It is the death sentence of a society to force children to kill in wars. It is the ultimate mark of criminality and cowardice to condemn women to relentless and systematic rape. We must bear witness to the value of every child in Darfur and the dignity of every woman in Congo. No faith or culture should condone the outrages against them. All of us must strive for the peace and security necessary for progress.

Africans are standing up for this future. Here, too, Ghana is helping to point the way forward. Ghanaians should take pride in your contributions to peacekeeping from Congo to Liberia to Lebanon, and in your efforts to resist the scourge of the drug trade. We welcome the steps that are being taken by organizations like the African Union and ECOWAS to better resolve conflicts, keep the peace, and support those in need. And we encourage the vision of a strong, regional security architecture that can bring effective, transnational force to bear when needed.

America has a responsibility to advance this vision, not just with words, but with support that strengthens African capacity. When there is genocide in Darfur or terrorists in Somalia, these are not simply African problems — they are global security challenges, and they demand a global response. That is why we stand ready to partner through diplomacy, technical assistance, and logistical support, and will stand behind efforts to hold war criminals accountable. And let me be clear: our Africa Command is focused not on establishing a foothold in the continent, but on confronting these common challenges to advance the security of America, Africa and the world.

In Moscow, I spoke of the need for an international system where the universal rights of human beings are respected, and violations of those rights are opposed. That must include a commitment to support those who resolve conflicts peacefully, to sanction and stop those who don't, and to help those who have suffered. But ultimately, it will be vibrant democracies like Botswana and Ghana which roll back the causes of conflict, and advance the frontiers of peace and prosperity.

As I said earlier, Africa's future is up to Africans.

The people of Africa are ready to claim that future. In my country, African-Americans — including so many recent immigrants — have thrived in every sector of society. We have done so despite a difficult past, and we have drawn strength from our African heritage. With strong institutions and a strong will, I know that Africans can live their dreams in Nairobi and Lagos; in Kigali and Kinshasa; in Harare and right here in Accra.

Fifty-two years ago, the eyes of the world were on Ghana. And a young preacher named Martin Luther King traveled here, to Accra, to watch the Union Jack come down and the Ghanaian flag go up. This was before the march on Washington or the success of the civil rights movement in my country. Dr. King was asked how he felt while watching the birth of a nation. And he said: "It renews my conviction in the ultimate triumph of justice."

Now, that triumph must be won once more, and it must be won by you. And I am particularly speaking to the young people. In places like Ghana, you make up over half of the population. Here is what you must know: the world will be what you make of it.

You have the power to hold your leaders accountable and to build institutions that serve the people. You can serve in your communities and harness your energy and education to create new wealth and build new connections to the world. You can conquer disease, end conflicts and make change from the bottom up. You can do that. Yes you can. Because in this moment, history is on the move.

But these things can only be done if you take responsibility for your future. It won't be easy. It will take time and effort. There will be suffering and setbacks. But I can promise you this: America will be with you. As a partner. As a friend. Opportunity won't come from any other place, though — it must come from the decisions that you make, the things that you do, and the hope that you hold in your hearts.

Freedom is your inheritance. Now, it is your responsibility to build upon freedom's foundation. And if you do, we will look back years from now to places like Accra and say that this was the time when the promise was realized — this was the moment when prosperity was forged; pain was overcome; and a new era of progress began. This can be the time when we witness the triumph of justice once more. Thank you.

Bare faced lies from OGD's team (As reported by a former aide to OGD)

It is becoming very clear that the Ogun State Governor, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, is surrounded by persons with little or no understanding of Public Relations. These ‘journalism professionals’ have also proved incapable of using previous newsroom experience to assist a principal rolling from one avoidable crisis to another as if cursed to be opposed to anything and anyone around him forever.

No other person exhibited this naivety more than the Hon. Commissioner for Information, Mr. Kayode Samuel, in a recent statement, which was also used generously as paid advertisement in selected media houses. He even followed it up with a press conference on Thursday celebrating what his team naively believe amounted to a bursting of the story did by National Life on Daniel last Saturday.

As usual with these famed apostles of bare faced lies, a derisive reference was made to a certain former Chief Press Secretary to the Governor accusing him of super-imposing Daniel’s head on the body of an actress, as if one was in the employment of National Life. The same statement, I understand, has been turned into a leaflet which is being circulated all over the place with radio and television jingles supplementing it. What an ingenious way to waste scarce resources of the state!

Before delving into the theatre of the absurd being played out by Daniel’s men, who currently pretend to be managing his image, it is important to give these failed professionals a brief lesson in journalism. Without standing in for National Life, it is important to place the stories done by Nigerian Compass and National Life beside each other. Nigerian Compass, owned by the Ogun State Governor, published two photographs claiming both belonged to Hon. Wale Alausa showing where he had gone to take an oath.

In an analysis, I did on the morning the photographs were published, one was able to show that there was manipulation in one of the photographs. Even after Alausa had admitted he indeed took an oath to the Governor naked, it was clearly established that only one of the two photographs published by Nigerian Compass was genuine. The second one was manipulated. Unfortunately, till date, the newspaper is yet to come clean concerning this fact. Yet, a i tete mu ole, o fe mu oloko!!!

In the case of National Life, the newspaper published a story along with interviews from prominent figures who gave a graphic account of how OGD does his oath-taking with a statement from Samuel debunking the allegation. Till date, none of the people interviewed by National Life has denied granting the interview. But on its cover, there was a photograph used to illustrate the story. It was not the story. It was only an illustration, to my understanding as a journalist. And I am very sure Nigerian Compass has used similar illustrations to buttress their stories in the past.

An example was when a national newspaper published former President Olusegun Obasanjo and his deputy, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar wearing gloves. The newspaper only used that to illustrate the story of the political fight between both men. Not that they wore gloves to fight. Unfortunately, the Emperor’s goons would have us believe that illustration of newspaper or magazine stories with such photographs are not permitted. As long as you do not claim the photo is real as Nigerian Compass did with the second manipulated photograph of Alausa, you are free.

And recently, a journalist posted a twisted computer animated picture of Obasanjo on Facebook, showing the Ota Chicken Farmer as a bad man with a gun ready to do battle with whoever cares. Does that make OBJ real in the fun intended there? Daniel and the amateurs around him are scared of what others have on him. They naively believe they are the only custodians of dirty ‘facts’. Others have dirtier things, but are waiting for the right clime to make it public. The Emperor will dance naked for sure.

And back to the issue of Public Relations. Since the current round of crisis began with the failed bid to assassinate this writer on January 10, 2009, about the only competence displayed by Daniel’s media team is an expertise in the Nigerian form of Media Relations – distribution of gbalamu. Not once have they shown brilliance in strategically addressing issues or working to ensure that the publics of their principal give him a benefit of the doubt on the sundry allegations against the governor.

Bare faced lies, deliberate manipulations and often a desperate attempt to physically attack perceived opponents of Daniel remain the stock in trade of both full time employees and the emergency consultants milking the treasury of Ogun State dry in a morbid attempt to defend a drowning Emperor.

The first lesson a student of public relations will most likely learn is the importance of ensuring goodwill and mutual understanding between his/her principal and the principal’s publics. This is more than important concerning political public relations, given the usual cynicism that the average person often has about government. But events of the past few weeks in Ogun State reveal a crass ignorance of the workings of public relations.

You do not lie deliberately and take the people for granted. You would have lost all credibility. Your goodwill and whatever understanding between you and your publics would have gone through the window too. How can Samuel issue a statement denying oath-taking by Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) members in Ogun State? How can some of them claim Council chairmen were not coerced into taking fetish oath to pledge allegiance to the Governor shortly before their elections? What were herbalists of different shades doing in Otunba Asodidero (sorry, Asoludero) Court in Shagamu?

In Ososa, for instance, are you saying all the residents of that town are blind or without a sound mind? How do you expect them to react to your statement when they saw bus loads of people entering the town to take the oath as recently as two months ago? How will the furore in Ijebu Ode be treated when they learnt that their people were being given a paltry N20,000 after taking the oath? What about the friends and relations of the Council Chairmen and local government party chairmen who were forced through the same indignities before the last Congress? What about the naked oath-taking and pepper soup of the coffin in Shagamu?

In the months leading to the 2007 general elections, I was involved in organising key figures among street personalities to swear to an oath of allegiance for Daniel at a shrine in Shagamu. Hon. Gbenga Oduwaiye, who regularly led persons of doubtful loyalty to the shrine led the last batch of 33 men from Egbaland to the place. None of them is dead yet. They have friends and relations. It was fundamental in Senator Ibikunle Amosun’s loss of support among the boys on the streets.

In fact, a few months after the election, there was hardly anyone on the streets of Abeokuta who did not know the guys were angry because they were not being taken care of as promised by Daniel. Almost everyone in the state capital heard their complaints which were spiced up with gory tales about taking the oath while naked.
Why did Iyeru broke ranks? Why were Bona and Sir K complaining? Were they taken care of as promised? Mrs Titi Oseni would have been beaten up in her office right in the presence of her colleagues were it not for my intervention. And that was barely two months into her tenure as Speaker.

The boys believed as the highest ranking Egba figure in government, she should have spoken to the governor to ensure the pre-election promise of regular largesse was kept. Your Emperor should thank the current Commissioner for Special Duties, because I was able to organise a job in Sango Otta for the angry guys through his office. Till date, I did not even tell the Emperor. But the guys were happy, at least for a while, after that. They are still there with you. And when you now lie bare facedly about what you put them through, how do you want them to take subsequent statements from you.

But if it is the fear of the release of damaging materials on the Emperor you are scared of and have used the statement to rubbish it before it is made public, do not worry yourself. When it comes, there is nobody who will not know it is genuine. We should wait for a robust debate at that time. But for now all the lies about a former CPS meeting with Senator Bola Tinubu should be stopped. Tinubu’s people will just be laughing at you. Poor intelligence gathering means poor reaction. Since you do not have the required information, the other side can now see through you that you guys have no power.

Obama to stop Nigerian Journalists from his trip to Africa

President Barack Obama of United States to exclude Nigerian journalists from panel to select from thousands of text messages sent to him from Nigeria, Senegal, Kenya and South Africa. Only journalists from the other three countries were chosen for the selection panel.

Obama to take texts messages from Nigerians

ALTHOUGH his Air Force One presidential aircraft would not touch down in Abuja on his maiden trip to Africa, United States (U.S.) President, Barack Obama, plans to receive Nigerians' opinions about a broad spectrum of issues prior to the visit and has invited them, alongside a handful of other countries, to send him text message to some phone lines.

President Obama, who is expected in Ghana on Saturday, promised that those who send the text messages to him would receive highlights of his speech planned for Accra, the Ghanaian capital.

According to a statement by the U.S. government directed to Africans but which specifically listed Ghanaians, Nigerians, South Africans and Kenyans, "starting July 3, you are invited to send a text message to President Barack Obama with your questions and comments in advance of his visit to Africa.

"Those who respond early will receive SMS highlights from his speech in Accra, Ghana, on Saturday, July 11. This service is available in both English and French."

The statement added that President Obama would directly answer selected questions through local radio broadcasts in Africa.

It warned that text messages might be subject to local and international charges "as stipulated by your carrier."

The statement added: "To send a text message to President Obama, from anywhere in Africa, simply text 'English' or 'French' to +61418601934. If you do not receive a confirmation of your enrollment within 10 minutes, please send again to +45609910343. For Kenya use short code 5683, for Ghana use short code 1731, for Nigeria use short code 32969 and for South Africa use short code 31958. Capacity is limited so please text right away."

In an interview with allafrica.com, the U.S. President said one of the reasons he would visit Ghana was that the country " has now undergone a couple of successful elections in which power was transferred peacefully, even in a very close election. I think that the new President, President Mills, has shown himself committed to the rule of law, to the kinds of democratic commitments that ensure stability in a country."

He added: "Countries that are governed well, that are stable, where the leadership recognises that they are accountable to the people and that institutions are stronger than any one person have a track record of producing results for the people. And we want to highlight that."

However, the U.S. President conceded that he does not expect every country to undergo democratic transitions in the same way and at the same time.

Yet, he argued that "we have seen progress in democracy and transparency and the rule of law, in the protection of property rights, in anti-corruption efforts. We have seen progress over the last several years; in some cases, though, we're also seeing some backsliding."

While he did not mention Nigeria in the interview, Obama pointedly expressed his concern about Kenya, where his late father hailed from.

His words: "In my father's own country of Kenya, I'm concerned about how the political parties do not seem to be moving into a permanent reconciliation that would allow the country to move forward. And Kenya is not alone in some of the problems that we've seen of late, post-election or pre-election."

He added: "We just want to make sure that people are mindful that this isn't just some abstract notion that we're trying to impose on Africa.

"There is a very practical, pragmatic consequence to political instability and corruption when it comes to whether people can feed their families, educate their children, and we think that Africa - the African continent - is a place of extraordinary promise as well as challenges. We're not going to be able to fulfill those promises unless we see better governance."

Excessive laptop use linked to infertility

Many men do not know that sitting for a long time and excessive use of laptops could have serious effects on their fertility levels. Experts say there are salient factors that may contribute to infertility

“An optimum temperature of between 35 and 36 degree Celsius is needed to produce healthy sperm and so conditions that raise the temperature would not ensure production of quality sperm
in moderation.” Mean


LAPTOPS are becoming increasingly common among young men wired into to the latest technology, but the heat from these computers can affect sperm production and development, making it difficult for them to father a child later in life
LAPTOPS Experts have said habits like placing a laptop on one’s lap can cause damage to the sperm and as such more attention be paid to its excessive use, especially in young men
The combination of heat generated by the computers and the posture needed to balance the
equipment on the lap, leads to raised temperatures around the scrotum. Men naturally sit with their legs further apart to keep the testicles at an ideal temperature and for greater comfort
However, when working on a laptop, they will adopt a less natural position in order to balance it on their laps, which results in a significant rise in body heat between their thighs

While fatherhood might be far from the minds of most young men, experts said that behaviour patterns that were established early on and exposure to chemicals that are toxic to sperm production may impact their ability to become a dad later in life
The finding published in the journal, Human Reproduction involved 29 volunteers aged 21 to 35
It found that sitting with the thighs together to balance a laptop caused scrotal temperatures to rise by 2.1C
But when the laptop was in use, average temperatures rose by 2.6C on the left of the scrotum and 2.8C on the right

The study found that within the first 15 minutes of using a laptop, scrotal temperatures had increased by 1C (33.8F)
Even though experts do not know the exact frequency and time of heat exposure that would lead to reversible or irreversible changes to sperm, they pointed out that frequent use of laptops over years without sufficient recovery time between exposures may cause irreversible or partially reversible changes in male reproductive function
a doctor, an urologist said there were lots of toxic pollutants and chemical substances that could affect body tissues, including sperm quality and production
According to him, the testes are organs that produce rapidly dividing
cells and in the course of doing this, exposure to environmental toxins and chemical substances that affect cell division can affect it, causing some genetic changes in the cells
He declared, “Things like smoking, use of hard drugs, coffee intake and alcohol had been implicated in infertility in men. My approach to them in the management of patients with infertility problem is to preach moderation in their usage. We do not yet have conclusive evidences or causatives and effect type of research linking these substances to infertility problems and so the best way out is for them to do all
in moderation.” Another doctor in his own view, said there was no need doubting the fact that too high a temperature in the genitals of a man, will affect his fertility level
“The testes are actually outside the body to reduce the effect of heat on them. You will find that in a cold environment, the testicles shrink and go further into the body, whereas in the warm environment, this may not be so,” he explained
An optimum temperature of between 35 and 36 degree Celsius is needed to produce healthy sperm
and so conditions that raise the temperature would not ensure production of quality sperm
Meanwhile there are evidences to backup the fact that sperm counts have dropped by almost a third in a decade and that about 40 per cent of fertility issues are attributed to males. Infertility is already a major health problem in both the developed and developing world, with up to one in six couples requiring specialist investigation or treatment in order to conceive. The reasons are unclear, but drug use alcohol, smoking and obesity are factors. Pesticides chemicals, diseases like diabetes and radioactive material have also been linked to decreases in fertility Scientists found that sperm from diabetic men have greater levels of DNA damage than sperm from men who do not have the disease. Sperm DNA damage impairs male fertility and reproductive health
Dr Ishola Agbaje, a research fellow in the Reproductive Medicine Research Group at Queen’s University, Belfast looking at the implication of diabetes on infertility problem in men said that “the increasing incidence of systemic diseases such as diabetes may further exacerbate this decline in male fertility.” A possible relationship between men’s diets and the quality of their semen has long been a discussion point, too. There are evidences that suggested that intake of fruits and vegetables can help preserve semen quality. Spanish researchers declared that men who eat large amounts of meat and full fat dairy products have lower seminal quality than those who eat more fruit, vegetables and reduced fat dairy products
The study was carried out among 61 men, 30 of whom had reproductive problems, while the remaining 31 acted as controls. Among the couples with fertility problems coming to the clinic, the men with good semen quality ate more vegetables and fruit (more vitamins, folic acid and fibre and less proteins and fats) than those men with low seminal quality
Chemical exposure also causes male infertility According to a research carried out by scientists from the Universities of Sheffield and Manchester, men working as painters and decorators who are exposed to solvents such as glycol ether have a 2.5 fold increased risk of having a low motile sperm count compared to men with low exposure

In additional to chemical exposure men who had undergone previous surgery at the testicles or who undertook manual work were more likely to have low motile sperm counts, whereas men who drank alcohol regularly or wore boxer shorts were more likely to have better semen quality

Meanwhile, existing research into male fertility by some experts has recommended tips to protect fertility
These include: •Avoiding hot tubs •Wearing boxers instead of briefs •Exercising moderately (one hour, three to five times per week) to avoid excessive weight gain •Avoiding exercise that can generate heat or trauma to the genital area •Eating well and having good night rest •Staying hydrated and limiting caffeine to no more than two cups per day •Refraining from smoking

Ritualist in Ogun State Politics!

By Yinka Adeyemi(email: oluyinkaadeyemi@gmail.com)

Well, it is clear right from the start that Nigerian politics is a Do or Die affair. from this nonsense, it is obvious that many of our political leaders will even, or have even gone to extreme lengths like human sacrifice. of course, we know this is happening, just to stay in or get to power (and the accompanying free for all looting.

I am yet to come across anybody praising Wale Alausa for this oath taking. None. I have posted several opinions since the news broke out and my position is that Wale is a compound fool. He will live to regret his actions. He was foolish to have allowed himself to be so used. He is an adult. A man. Husband, I assume, to a wife and father to his children.

He is a disgrace to the Ijebus and Nigeria as a whole. I am ashamed of his conduct. I felt scandalized. So, Wale is not guilt free at all.

I cannot support Wale on this despicable act. Never. Wale must be a fool. I reserve my comment on Alhaji Alausa and Awujale as I have expressed my opinion elsewhere which I will hold for some reason beyond the scope of this forum.

Wale will have to carry his cross for as long as he is alive. I am aware OGD will address a press conference on this issue. Maybe he should shelve the idea as I can almost predict the release will be a replica of what is aides have been saying.

What they have not addressed which is not strange is the role of OGD in this shameless event. Who took Wale’s photo? Was it to Wale’s knowledge and approval?

Can they sincerely tell us what role OGD played or did not play in this event? This is not Wale's event. It is OGD/Wale's event? Has Awujale denied Wale’s claim? Has Alhaji Agboola denied? What about the comment by Egbetokun that 22 members took oath with OGD? Who is the principal actor?.

This is not about being objective or being subjective. So, to expect OGD’s aides to be objective is to expect OGD to admit that he is involved!! Nigerians are waiting for him to deny it but opinion has been formed already and it may just be too late. This is not just about Wale Alausa. It is about the citizens of Ogun State who are civil, decent, and tolerant and hardworking but who are being led by a band of thugs in the PDP where OGD is the chief promoter. What a shame!

And now, the very good people of Yewa are still being made to believe that without OGD, their son or daughter cannot govern Ogun in 2011. To hold on to this willy nilly is to be prepared to visit the shrine of the chief ABORE of Ogun state where fathers will be compelled by the paramount rulers of Yewa to commit their sons/daughters to eternal damnation under OGD.

This is not about being subjective. Humans are not created to be objective. Objectivity is learned. We are all conditioned by events, environment, experience and background among others. It is about salvaging our dear state from a power drunk maniac desperate to consign the destiny of millions into eternal darkness on the altar of ego and ambition. We have had other people govern Ogun before and not once, did we have this shameless encounter under any administration. We had Aiyekoto from Ijebu, we had Osoba from Egba, they both had their failings as human beings, but neither Aiyekoto nor Osoba turned our state into a big shrine. And yet, these men were traditional chiefs.

Oba ti o je ti ilu toro, oruko e ko ni pare, Oba ti o je ti ilu tuka oruko e ko ni pare.

To me, I think at this juncture we should not be sentimental on the issue of OATH taking in Ogun Politics. In as much everybody knows our politicians have become nothing but a hand tool of devil. we should not be attaching sentiment to this matter. please dont let us presume in this story, let's get to the root of the matter. every good information that will elaborate this misdenamour are welcome from great minds outside there.
Your Ad Here